Andro Critics “La sainte Courtisane” By Oscar Wilde.

Andro Critics “La sainte Courtisane” By Oscar Wilde.  

After Reading the script honest that I am confused and curious about the contents of this drama story. Unfortunately, the story was not finished and will not even be completed by the author. The author in this story is named Oscar Wilde. He was born in Dublin, Ireland. he was a playwright. when he wrote the drama about "La Saint Courtisane" he was in prison and served a sentence of forced labor for 2 years because of a homosexual case. The author died at the age of 46 due to inflammation of the lining of the brain. so the drama script was not finished.  

In this script the author describe the characters in the story which is called andro. start from first character Myrrhina,   

MYRRHINA: Dwells he not here, the beautiful young hermit, he who will not look on the face of woman?  

FIRST MAN : Of a truth it is here the hermit dwells. 

MYRRHINA : Why will he not look on the face of woman? 

SECOND MAN : We do not know. 

MYRRHINA : Why do ye yourselves not look at me? 

MYRRHINA : Tell me more about the beautiful young hermit. Talk to me About the beautiful young hermit who will not look on the Face of woman. What is the story of his days? What mode of Life has he? 

The author describes the figure of the character myrrhina who is a teaser. in general, a woman is depicted by a shy character and does not dare to tease, so the author describes the cross. In my opinion the author makes the character Myrrhina with good looking and teasing. in general, a man sees the appearance of a beautiful woman he avoids because according to him it is difficult to get his heart let alone the woman from nobility. therefore the author describes the character Myrrhina is a teaser.  

And then the author describe the character of first man and second man. 

FIRST MAN : Of old a centaur lived there. When the hermit came the  

centaur gave a shrill cry, wept and lamented, and galloped away. 

SECOND MAN : No. It was a white unicorn who lived in the cave. When it saw the hermit coming the unicorn knelt down and worshipped him. Many people saw it worshipping him. 

FIRST MAN : I have talked with people who saw it. 

SECOND MAN : Some say he was a hewer of wood and worked for hire. But that may not be true. 

Now, the author describe the character of man that likes to find out about other people. In general, a man who ignores and don’t worry about people’s business. So this character is cross from the general man. Usually a woman that like kepo with other people’s business.  

And then the last character from the script is Honorius and also the author describe this character.  

The beauty of the soul increases until it can see God. Therefore, Myrrhina, repent of thy sins.  

Let me taste of the seven sins. 

You can see that the author describe the character honorius even a man who is close to God cannot fight lust. And in my opinion the author describes the character in general as a man.  

The issue raised from this story is that a sinner, teasing someone can even change it. but on the other hand the hermit cannot hold his own lusts so that he sins.  

Analysis Christmas in Leningrad

Christmas in Leningrad by Dustin bowcott, after Reading this story a vocabolary easily understood by every reader and also make me curious not only me i thinks everyone whom read this story curious too. I will analysis intrinsik element of drama, especially this story “Christmas in Leningrad”

Plot Introduction in this story there are two people who’s Named Pyotr and Ekaterina. Pyotr 35 years old want to do The best for his family, Ekaterina 32 years old want to her son survive. Rising action when it was the time of world war, family hit. Ekaterina tells Pyotr to look for meat for her child.  It is unfortune because there is not even a Cannibal without Ekaterina to Pyotr. Conflict when the sound of a machine bomb bombs from a distance, Pyotr is looking for food, then hehe ran home scared. Arriving atau home, Ekaterina asked if you hot food because they could not get their food into a fight. Climax the next day Pyotr searched for food in a trash cantik and met a Grigor who was carrving the body of his little daughter to be buried. Pyotr pretended to help to bury butuh hehe found out tahtanya wanted the body to be eaten. Shouted Grigor tahtanya Pyotr was a Cannibal. The falling action, when Pyotr intends to bring the body was found out by guard. Finally hehe returned emply – handed . the denoument, Guard comes to Pyotr’selamat house and Ekaterina sees  that she hasil a mental disorder and event cuts Pyotr’s thigh. This story is close ending the problem was found out and there was not continuous of the story.

Setting: there are three element of setting that is setting time, setting place and setting social. The story a setting time is : war time world and in the morning, the story happened at the time of the world was and there was starvation there was no meat so that hujan were eaten ( Cannibal).  Setting palce : Pyotr’s house, he running to his house when heard bom bom. Grave yard : Grigor will buruk his little daughter. And the city, the story happened in the city atau the time world war. Setting social : because atau the time there was a world war, famine hitam so there was no meat so they eat other humans. ( Cannibal).

Character : protagonis : Pyotr , antagonis: Ekaterina and supporting character : Grigor and guard. Characterization : rounded ( Pyotr and Ekaterina) because they could not maintaining his child, Ekaterina was mentally Disturbed and change his character. Flat : ( Grigor and Guard) because they are no change they character. Development of character : dynamic : Pyotr and Ekaterina. Static : Grigor and Guard.

Point of view : omniscient, bot occurs when both are cons when Ekaterina asked Pyotr to find meat, but hunger stuck the city. Ekaterina told looking for fresh meat and  sacrifices were fine. Finally Pyotr searched for the body but was discovered by Grigor and Guard that they were a Cannibal.
Theme, there are two theme that is social and egoistis. Social issue is everyone need to socialize when Pyotr takes action to look for fresh meat and hehe meets a Grigor who is carrying the Corpse of a little daughter. There is Communications that Pyotr pretended to help bury but hadir another intention of wanting the Corpse. Egoistis : in this story Ekaterina forced Pyotr to look for fresh meat at all costs despite the state of being starved because of the time of the role of the world Ekaterina's selfishness depressed Pyotr so that event the Cannibal were okay.

 The conclusion from this story there is message that we can find from the story always thankful for what is happening, do not be a selfish person only for his own benefit so that it hurts other people.